Bruce & Russell v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• taking judicial notice of “three filings” and noting that “the [c]ourt can only consider their existence, which is limited to the nature of the form and the filing date”
• a court may take notice of “facts which are a matter of public record”
• “[W]hile the Court can take judicial notice of the attachments to [defendant’s] motion to dismiss as they are public records, it cannot take the facts asserted in the filings to be true.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).