Skip to main content
· 7/20/1990

Bruce Penny and James Penny v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company

Citations

  • 906 F.2d 183
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 12120
  • 1990 WL 91088

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declaring that where an agency “has no power to provide the remedy sought, then, exclusive jurisdiction cannot rest in that body.”
  • declaring that when primary jurisdiction is applicable, the court has concurrent jurisdiction; thus, if the administrative body does not make a finding within a reasonable time, the case may properly return to the court for disposition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Politz, King, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.