· 7/20/1990
Bruce Penny and James Penny v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
Citations
- 906 F.2d 183
- 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 12120
- 1990 WL 91088
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declaring that where an agency “has no power to provide the remedy sought, then, exclusive jurisdiction cannot rest in that body.”
- declaring that when primary jurisdiction is applicable, the court has concurrent jurisdiction; thus, if the administrative body does not make a finding within a reasonable time, the case may properly return to the court for disposition
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Politz, King, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.