Bruce Herman v. Peter Herman and Peter Herman, P.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the court had substituted the proper respondent after member of the panel asked at oral argument for the named respondent “People of Illinois” to supply the court with the name of the proper respondent
• no constitutional error where defendant was denied opportunity to present testimony from defense investigator that unavailable third-party declarant had confessed to crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).