Skip to main content
· 2/4/2003

Bruce A. Wallace v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co.

Citations

  • 318 F.3d 723
  • 29 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2485
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 1820
  • 2003 WL 223438

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “No case of which we are aware holds that, when a plan participant’s own doctors opine that he is again able to work, the insurer or plan administrator must refer the participant to additional physicians in quest of one who will find a disabling condition.”
  • “No case of which we are aware holds that, when a plan participant’s own doctors opine that he is again able to work, the insurer . . . must refer the participant to addi- tional physicians in quest of one who will find a disabling condition.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Ripple, Rovner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.