Bruce A. Bracey v. Office of Personnel Management

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that this court can review whether the statutes and regulations related to disability retirement benefits have been properly construed
• finding that Mr. Bracey’s light duty assignment could not be considered an accommodation because he was not performing the duties of his official Electronic Worker position, but rather, performing duties of a lower-graded position
• defining “accommodation” under CSRS regulations as an adjustment enabling employee to perform the duties of his official position, not reassignment to an accommodated position
• ex- plaining that this court can review whether the statutes and regulations related to disability retirement benefits have been properly construed
• “We are aware of no setting in the federal employment system in which an employee is considered to hold a ‘position’ consisting of a set of ungraded, unclassified duties that have been assigned to that employee on an ad hoc basis.”
• “We are aware of no setting in the federal employment system in which an employee is considered to hold a ‘position’ consisting of a set of ungraded, unclassified duties that have been assigned to that employee on an ad hoc basis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).