· 12/29/2004
Brucato v. Ezenia! Inc.
Citations
- 351 F. Supp. 2d 464
- 55 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 718
- 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26231
- 2004 WL 3029827
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding statement at top of accompanying letter that the enclosed check “represented payments for outstanding commission” was adequately conspicuous
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ellis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.