Brozovsky v. Norquest

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating in case requiring witness to submit to subpoena that the general rule is that an order regarding discovery against a non-party is not appealable because it can always be reviewed on appeal from a final judgment in the case
• order granting or denying motion for protective order is not final judgment or decision for purposes of appeal
• “ ‘ “ ‘ [w]hen no further action of the court is required to dispose of the cause pending, it is final; when the cause is retained for further action ... it is interlocutory’ ” ’ ”
• discovery order can be reviewed on appeal from final judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).