Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 3/30/1994

Broz v. Winland

Citations

  • 68 Ohio St. 3d 521
  • 629 N.E.2d 395

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “the test under the insurance policy was not whether the plaintiff believed he was licensed to drive but whether he reasonably believed he was authorized to drive the car.”
  • permission from an authorized user creates a question of fact as to whether the driver had a reasonable belief that she was entitled to use the car
  • Civ.R. 50(A)(4) requires the trial court to give the party against whom the motion is made “the benefit of all reasonable inferences that may be drawn from the evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Broz v. Winland

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.