Broyles v. State Road Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “the defendant is not prejudiced by the amendment [to add 36 additional plaintiffs] because the amended claims are not new or different, but rather virtually identical to the original claims”
• relying on then Rule 39(e), relation back based on same “conduct, transaction, or occurrence”
• discussing the Court of Claim’s 1969 Rule 39(c), identical to RCFC 15(c)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).