Broyles v. Reilly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, absent reason for exclusion, personal injury plaintiff was entitled to have court reporter present at physical exam and \[t]here is no reason that the presence of a videographer at an examination should be treated differently\
• \[I]t would take an exceptional circumstance to permit anyone other than a videographer or court reporter and the plaintiff's attorney to be present on behalf of the plaintiff at a compulsory examination held pursuant to rule 1.360.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).