· 12/20/1993
Broyhill Furniture Industries, Inc. v. Craftmaster Furniture Corporation
Citations
- 12 F.3d 1080
- 27 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1247
- 29 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1283
- 94 Daily Journal DAR 3922
- 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 33013
- 1993 WL 522817
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that fraud on the court means “a fraud perpetrated by officers of the court so that the judicial machinery cannot perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases”
- referring to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) (“This rule does not limit the power of a court to entertain an independent action to relieve a party from a judgment, order, or proceeding ... or to set aside a judgment for fraud upon the court.”)
- no relief under 60(b)(6) where fraudulent evidence was not submitted to court
- section 1983 claims must be premised on violation of federal 13 constitutional right
- “[l]t is well established that a judgment is void for purposes of 60(b)(4) only when the court that rendered the judgment lacked jurisdiction or failed to act in accordance with due process of law.”
- “[I]t is well established that a judgment is void for purposes of 60(b)(4) only when the court that rendered the judgment lacked jurisdiction or failed to act in accordance with due process of law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lourie, Plager, Rich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.