Brownlee v. Stocker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining factors to be considered in de termining whether an accused was prejudiced
• upholding the military judge’s decision to preclude the appellant from cross-examining a witness on “incidents of past drug usage or sale” because they “do not necessarily demonstrate” either “character for truthfulness” or “motive or bias . . . under [MIL. R. EVID.] 608(c
• first prong: nature of Government’s case
• fourth prong: substitute evidence in record
• second prong: value to defense case
• third prong: materiality of evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).