Browning v. Stocks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the seller’s separate property disclosure statement was relevant to the buyers’ claim that the seller fraudulently induced the sale by actively concealing termite damage
• holding that merger clause cannot bar fraud claim where buyer affirms sales contract and claims fraud was seller’s active or passive concealment of damage or defects in purchased property
• claim of fraudulent concealment not barred by affirmation of contract, including entire agreement clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).