Brownell v. Fred M. Manning, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]t is the better practice to wait until trial to rule on objections when admissibility substantially depends upon what facts may be developed there”
• although railroad introduced evidence indicating that it had funded approximately 75% of the RRA disability benefits, court was “wholly unpersuaded” that Eichel and Green were not binding
• “[T]he prevailing weight of authority today is that, to the limited extent 24 that opinions about the cause of an injury are a necessary part of a patient’s treatment, treating physicians may opine on causation . . . .”
• “As far as unnamed witnesses are concerned, without knowing who they are or what their testimony might be, … the plaintiff has chosen to leave the court in the dark. Thus, in those respects, plaintiff’s motion [in limine] must be denied, at least for now.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).