Skip to main content
· 9/25/2002

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Chesley

Citations

  • 194 Misc. 2d 540
  • 749 N.Y.S.2d 842
  • 2002 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1427

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining unpatentability issues decided on appeal were “locked in on remand by the man- date rule”
  • “[W]e Case: 24-1600 Document: 87 Page: 13 Filed: 06/05/2026 HAFEMAN v. GOOGLE LLC 13 cannot conclude that the Board’s decision [terminating the petition] was purely a sanctions decision over which we or- dinarily would have jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Figueroa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.