Brown Vs. Slyman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Alabama's capital sentencing scheme, which utilizes a fact-finding jury, remains constitutional under Hurst
• holding that the Supreme Court of the United States's decision in Hurst did not invalidate Alabama's capital-sentencing scheme

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).