Skip to main content
· 10/15/1852

Brown v. Waterman

Citations

  • 64 Mass. 117

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding government agency should not be penalized by requirement to pay fees when it provided records “above and beyond” original request, and thus vacating fee award insofar as it granted relief beyond originally contested issues
  • “[W]e hold that a party may ‘substantially prevail’ under A.R.S. § 39-121.02 for the purposes of attorney fees and costs only to the extent an action is necessary to accomplish the purpose of an original records request.”
  • “[W]e hold that a party may ‘substantially prevail’ under A.R.S. § 39-121.02 for the purposes of attorney fees and costs only to the extent an action is necessary to accomplish the purpose of an original records request.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Metcalf

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.