Skip to main content
· 1/6/1986

Brown v. United Pacific Insurance

Citations

  • 711 P.2d 1105
  • 42 Wash. App. 503

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • criticizing Ward for ignoring policy language in order to extend coverage for policy reasons, and concluding that no isolated use was apparent because vehicle was owned and regularly used by insured's spouse, who qualified as \you\ under the policy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Webster

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.