· 1/6/1986
Brown v. United Pacific Insurance
Citations
- 711 P.2d 1105
- 42 Wash. App. 503
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- criticizing Ward for ignoring policy language in order to extend coverage for policy reasons, and concluding that no isolated use was apparent because vehicle was owned and regularly used by insured's spouse, who qualified as \you\ under the policy
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Webster
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.