Brown v. the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “electronic scanning of documents is the modern-day equivalent of ‘exemplification and copies of paper,’ and therefore, can be taxed pursuant to § 1920(4)”
• holding that “electronic scanning of documents is the modern-day equivalent of ‘exemplification and copies of paper,’ and therefore, can be taxed pursuant to § 1920(4).”
• “[T]he electronic scanning of documents is the modern-day equivalent of ‘... copies of paper,’ and, therefore, can be taxed pursuant to § 1920(4).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).