Brown v. Tarver

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff may bring a private cause of action under CUTPA for a violation of CUIPA
• holding that the defendant's alleged unfair claim settlement practices with regard to a single insurance claim do not constitute a CUIPA violation and, therefore, such allegations also fail to establish a CUTPA violation
• noting that an insurer’s “alleged improper conduct in the handling of a single insurance claim, without any evidence of misconduct . . . in the processing of any other claim, does not rise to the level of a ‘general business practice.’”
• noting that an insurer’s “alleged improper conduct in the handling of a single insurance claim, without any evidence of misconduct . . . in the processing of any other claim, does not rise to the level of a ‘general business practice’”
• affirming trial court’s determination on motion for summary judgment, as matter of law, that undisputed evidence did not demon- strate general business practice by defendant
• declining to address whether a private cause of action exists under CUIPA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).