Brown v. Stogsdill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the doctrine is to be given broad effect in Arizona
• remanding case for trier of fact to determine whether parents could be held liable for son’s negligence under family purpose doctrine where son maintained his own insurance on the vehicle involved in a collision
• “[T]he fact that the [driver/son] was using the vehicle solely for his own purpose and pleasure at the time of the accident would not automatically rule out the application of the family purpose doctrine.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).