Brown v. St. Paul City Railway Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that report prepared pursuant to an established business routine was admissible under business-records exception where report had many uses besides litigation
• concluding that report prepared pursuant to an established business routine was admissible under business-records exception where report had many uses besides litigation
• concluding that properly identified hospital records admissible to prove matters related to patient’s hospitalization and treatment but hearsay and self-serving statements contained in records not admissible to prove how injury occurred
• concluding that properly identified hospital records admissible to prove matters related to patient's hospitalization and treatment but hearsay and self-serving statements contained in records not admissible to prove how injury occurred
• “When facts are presented upon which the claimed privilege rests, it then becomes necessary for the court to determine whether the privilege exists much the same as in the determination of other fact issues.”
• whether document or communication is privileged is fact question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).