Brown v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “If [the petitioner] can show that his due process rights were violated in the subject disciplinary proceedings, then § 2241 would be the appropriate remedy to use to restore his good time credits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Williams v. Fountain
  Eleventh Circuit· 1996-03-08· cited 41×
• Abdulhaseeb v. Ward
  Tenth Circuit· 2006-03-27· cited 36×
• Sherratt v. Friel
  Tenth Circuit· 2008-02-04· cited 1×
• United States v. Furman
  Tenth Circuit· 1997-04-02
• Hammond v. D.C. Record Center
  District of Columbia· 2009-01-22

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rhodes v. Chapman
  Supreme Court· 1981-06-15· cited 6,761×
• Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. Hill
  Supreme Court· 1985-06-17· cited 4,010×
• Ruben Ramirez Sanchez v. H.G. Miller, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Marion, Illinois
  Seventh Circuit· 1986-06-09· cited 211×
• Charles Mendoza v. Harold G. Miller, Warden
  Seventh Circuit· 1985-12-19· cited 135×
• Jackson v. Carlson
  Seventh Circuit· 1983-05-12· cited 132×
• Arias, Rene v. The United States Parole Commission Warden, U. S. Penitentiary, Lewisburg, Pa.
  Third Circuit· 1981-05-07· cited 80×
• Billy Ray Dawson v. William French Smith and Harold G. Miller
  Seventh Circuit· 1983-10-07· cited 60×
• Brown v. Smith
  Tenth Circuit· 1987-09-18· cited 48×
• Gerald McCollum Clifton C. Piggie-Bey, Harry L. Greene-El and Reynaldo Ramirez-Rodriguez v. Jerald Williford, Warden
  Seventh Circuit· 1986-06-20· cited 20×