Skip to main content
· 11/9/1935

Brown v. Shellabarger Mill & Elevator Co.

Citations

  • 142 Kan. 476
  • 50 P.2d 919
  • 1935 Kan. LEXIS 7

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the exception is intended to address “any potential (however unlikely) for police overreach in attempting to obtain search warrants”
  • “Defendant has presented no authority indicating that for probable cause to exist, there must be a substantial basis for inferring that defenses do not apply.”
  • “A search warrant 32 may only be issued upon a showing of probable cause.”
  • “A search warrant 32 may only be issued upon a showing of probable cause.”
  • because possession and manufacture of marijuana remains illegal under Michigan law, “to establish probable cause, a search-warrant affidavit need not provide facts from which a magistrate could conclude that a suspect’s marijuana-related activities are specifically not legal under the MMMA”
  • because possession and manufacture of marijuana remains illegal under Michigan law, “to establish probable cause, a search-warrant affidavit need not provide facts from which a magistrate could conclude that a suspect’s marijuana-related activities are specifically not legal under the MMMA”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burch, Wedell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.