Skip to main content
· 8/3/1999

Brown v. Shanks

Citations

  • 185 F.3d 1122
  • 1999 Colo. J. C.A.R. 4720
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 18173
  • 1999 WL 565482

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The exhaustion requirement is satisfied if the issues have been properly presented to the highest state court, either by direct review of the conviction or in a postconviction attack.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Tacha, Baldock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.