Skip to main content
· 4/1/1912

Brown v. Selfridge

Citations

  • 224 U.S. 189
  • 32 S. Ct. 444
  • 56 L. Ed. 727
  • 1912 U.S. LEXIS 2295

Syllabus

<p>While in an action for malicious prosecution the burden of proving malice and want of probable cause is'on the plaintiff, Wheeler v. Nesbit, 24 How. 544, as the motives and circumstances are best known to the defendant, plaintiff is only required to adduce such proof as is affirmatively under his control, and which he can fairly be expected to be able to produce.</p> <p>In this case held that plaintiff did not produce all the testimony within her control and did-not sustain the burden even to that extent.</p> <p>In a suit for malicious prosecution, in the absence of plaintiff adducing facts properly expected to be under her control, the question of probable cause in a clear case is one for the court and, in this case, was properly taken from the jury.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiff bears the burden of proving malice and lack of probable cause
  • holding that plaintiff bears the burden of proving malice and lack of probable cause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Day

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.