Skip to main content
· 8/30/2000

Brown v. Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine

Citations

  • 760 A.2d 863
  • 2000 Pa. Super. 262
  • 2000 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2464

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reiterating that an appeal does not properly lie from order denying post-trial motions, but upon judgment entered following disposition of post-trial motions
  • reiterating that appeal does not properly lie from order denying post-trial motions, but upon judgment entered following disposition of post- (Footnote Continued Next Page
  • reiterating that appeal does not properly lie from order denying post-trial motions, but upon judgment entered following disposition of post-trial motions
  • providing that an appeal lies from the judgment entered following disposition of post-trial motions
  • noting “[t]he term ‘proximate cause’ is applied by the courts to those more or less undefined considerations which limit liability even where the fact of causation is clearly established.”
  • stating proximate cause may be determined as a matter of law, and finding defendant’s negligence was not a substantial factor under § 433

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Popovich, Todd, Brosky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.