Brown v. Perales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that aliens are generally bound by the admissions and concessions of their counsel
• stating that “under the regulations, there is no ‘limited’ appearance of counsel in immigration proceedings”
• “Absent egregious circumstances, a distinct and formal admission made before, during, or even after a proceeding by an attorney acting in his professional capacity binds his client as a judicial admission.”
• “Absent egregious circumstances, a distinct and formal admission made . . . by an attorney acting in his professional capacity binds his client as a judicial admission.” (citation omitted)
• “Absent egregious circumstances, a distinct and formal admission made before, during, or even after a proceeding by an attorney acting in his professional capacity binds his client as a judicial admission.”
• “Absent egregious circumstances, a distinct and formal admission made before, during, or even after a proceeding by an attorney acting in his professional capacity binds his client as a judicial admission.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).