Brown v. Patrick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “conclusory allegations in the complaint [that] are 13 speculative . . . do not state a plausible claim for relief”
• explaining that an applicant “bears the ultimate burden of 17 introducing . . . evidence without prompting from the IJ”
• explaining that where First Amendment rights are not implicated, court considers constitutional challenge “in light of the specific facts of the case at hand” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• rejecting a vagueness challenge to SORNA “in light of the specific facts of the case at hand.”
• “Interstate travel requires a departure from one State just as much as arrival in another.”
• “No one could read the statute and Guidelines and reasonably come away thinking that he did not need to update his registration after 18 months.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).