Brown v. Kirk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• conveying real estate by general description “except one half of all oil, gas and mineral rights which party of the first part reserves”
• “It is obvious from the deed here in question that the verbs ‘except’ and ‘reserve’ as well as the noun ‘reservation’ were used interchangeably, synonymously, and without reference or regard to their technical, legal meaning.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• O'BRIEN v. Village Land Co.
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1990-07-09· cited 200×
• Lazy Dog Ranch v. Telluray Ranch Corp.
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1998-10-19· cited 136×
• Radke v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1959-02-02· cited 67×
• Kadrmas v. Sauvageau
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1971-06-22· cited 24×
• McCormick v. Union Pacific Resources Co.
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2000-12-14· cited 23×
• Body v. McDonald
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1959-01-20· cited 14×
• v. Ferrari Energy, Inc
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2020-07-23· cited 10×
• First National Bank of Denver v. Allard
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1973-07-30· cited 9×
• Dixon v. Abrams
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1960-12-19· cited 7×
• O'BRIEN v. Village Land Co.
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1989-09-11· cited 7×
• Proctor v. Graham
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1973-02-27· cited 5×
• Appling v. Federal Land Bank of Wichita
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1991-07-18· cited 4×
• Mull Drilling Co. v. Medallion Petroleum, Inc.
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1991-03-28· cited 1×
• Great Northern Properties v. Extraction Oil and Gas
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2022-09-15