Skip to main content
· 1/16/1889

Brown v. Kennicott

Citations

  • 30 Ill. App. 89
  • 1888 Ill. App. LEXIS 225

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Because Hurtado did not raise either issue 21 [concerning whether the VE properly characterized his past relevant work], present 22 any evidence, or challenge the vocational expert’s testimony at the administrative 23 hearing, those arguments are forfeited.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gary

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.