· 2/18/1834
Brown v. Keene
Citations
- 33 U.S. 112
- 8 L. Ed. 885
- 8 Pet. 112
- 1834 U.S. LEXIS 569
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that “the averment of jurisdiction shall be positive”
- “The decisions of this court require, that the averment of jurisdiction shall be positive, that the declaration shall state expressly the fact on which jurisdiction depends.”
- “The decisions of this court require, that the averment of jurisdiction shall be positive, that the declaration shall state expressly the fact on which jurisdiction depends.”
- “The decisions of this court require, that the averment of jurisdiction shall be positive, that the declaration shall state expressly the fact on which jurisdiction depends.”
- statement of jurisdiction must be express; not sufficient that “jurisdiction may be inferred argumentatively”
- allegations must “state expressly the fact on which jurisdiction depends”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Marshall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.