Skip to main content
· 2/18/1834

Brown v. Keene

Citations

  • 33 U.S. 112
  • 8 L. Ed. 885
  • 8 Pet. 112
  • 1834 U.S. LEXIS 569

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “the averment of jurisdiction shall be positive”
  • “The decisions of this court require, that the averment of jurisdiction shall be positive, that the declaration shall state expressly the fact on which jurisdiction depends.”
  • “The decisions of this court require, that the averment of jurisdiction shall be positive, that the declaration shall state expressly the fact on which jurisdiction depends.”
  • “The decisions of this court require, that the averment of jurisdiction shall be positive, that the declaration shall state expressly the fact on which jurisdiction depends.”
  • statement of jurisdiction must be express; not sufficient that “jurisdiction may be inferred argumentatively”
  • allegations must “state expressly the fact on which jurisdiction depends”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marshall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.