· 11/26/1951
Brown v. Karas
Citations
- 237 P.2d 799
- 73 Ariz. 62
- 1951 Ariz. LEXIS 155
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- supreme court would “not ... consider ]” assignment of error when “[a]n examination of the notice of appeal indicate[d] that no appeal [had been] taken from the ruling of the court” that appellant had claimed was erroneous
- supreme court would “not . . . consider[]” assignment of error when “[a]n examination of the notice of appeal indicate[d] that no appeal [had been] taken from the ruling of the court” that appellant had claimed was erroneous
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Phelps, Udall, Stanford, De Concini Prade
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.