Skip to main content
· 11/26/1951

Brown v. Karas

Citations

  • 237 P.2d 799
  • 73 Ariz. 62
  • 1951 Ariz. LEXIS 155

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • supreme court would “not ... consider ]” assignment of error when “[a]n examination of the notice of appeal indicate[d] that no appeal [had been] taken from the ruling of the court” that appellant had claimed was erroneous
  • supreme court would “not . . . consider[]” assignment of error when “[a]n examination of the notice of appeal indicate[d] that no appeal [had been] taken from the ruling of the court” that appellant had claimed was erroneous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Phelps, Udall, Stanford, De Concini Prade

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.