Skip to main content
· 4/15/1880

Brown v. Hoffmeister

Citations

  • 71 Mo. 411

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discouraging the technical application of court rules and noting that Rule 98 “provides no sanction for failure to comply with its terms”
  • judge at first trial excluded late-disclosed confession, and judge at retrial allowed confession into evidence only during cross-examination and rebuttal
  • trial court has broad discretion in balancing the prejudicial effect of evidence against its probative value
  • absent contemporaneous objection, untimely request for jury instructions does not give notice to the court necessary to preserve an issue addressed by the requested instruction
  • “No rule or case in this State binds a second judge to a previous trial judge’s [] ruling.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sherwood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.