· 4/15/1880
Brown v. Hoffmeister
Citations
- 71 Mo. 411
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discouraging the technical application of court rules and noting that Rule 98 “provides no sanction for failure to comply with its terms”
- judge at first trial excluded late-disclosed confession, and judge at retrial allowed confession into evidence only during cross-examination and rebuttal
- trial court has broad discretion in balancing the prejudicial effect of evidence against its probative value
- absent contemporaneous objection, untimely request for jury instructions does not give notice to the court necessary to preserve an issue addressed by the requested instruction
- “No rule or case in this State binds a second judge to a previous trial judge’s [] ruling.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sherwood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.