Brown v. Guinn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the court acted within its discretion when it did not dismiss the plaintiff's action because he had failed to produce a copy of a written contract
• “[I]t is well established that non-compliance with Rule Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 45A03-1608-PL-1860 | June 2, 2017 Page 14 of 20 9.2(A) is not a per se bar to the action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).