Brown v. Goldstein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a judge may refuse to submit an issue to the jury “if no evidence exists to warrant its submission”
• holding that a judge may refuse to submit an issue to the jury “if no evidence exists to warrant its submission”
• holding that a trial court improperly refused to submit issue of contributory negligence because evidence of improper lookout and failure to timely apply brakes was conflicting and presented a factual question for the jury
• holding that a trial court improperly refused to submit issue of contributory negligence because evidence of improper lookout and failure to timely apply brakes was conflicting and presented a factual question for the jury
• holding refusal to submit a question is error if there is any probative evidence to support an affirmative finding
• holding refusal to submit a question is error if there is any probative evidence to support an affirmative finding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).