Brown v. Fortner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that prisoner’s right not to be endangered by dangerous driving while unbuckled was clearly established despite lack of published authority on- those- specific facts
• explaining that reasonable jury could find van driver’s refusal to fasten inmate’s seatbelt, driving in excess of speed limit, and following too closely (among other things) demonstrated deliberate indifference
• explaining that reasonable jury could find van driver’s refusal to fasten inmate’s seatbelt, driving in excess of speed limit, and following too closely (among other things) demonstrated deliberate indifference
• finding an Eighth amendment claim when 1 transport officers drove recklessly, did not belt the Plaintiff, and caused injuries
• finding driver’s refusal to fasten inmate’s seatbelt, driving in excess of speed limit, and following too closely (among other things) sufficient to show deliberate indifference to inmate’s safety
• finding driver's refusal to fasten inmate's seatbelt, driving in excess of speed limit, and following too closely (among other things) sufficient to show deliberate indifference to inmate's safety

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).