Brown v. Ford
Citations
- 120 Va. 233
- 91 S.E. 145
- 1917 Va. LEXIS 102
Syllabus
<p>1. Trusts. — Jurisdiction—Liens.—Where a court of equity in three chancery causes has taken the management and control of the whole corpus of a trust estate and in a fourth cause has taken jurisdiction to partition and distribute the realty and personalty of the estate, the court has unquestionable primary jurisdiction as a court of equity of a claim against one of the beneficiaries to the extent that such claim is an equitable lien on his interest in the estate under the control of the court.</p> <p>2. Trusts. — Creation of Equitable Lien. — An executory agreement on the part of a beneficiary to make the whole corpus of a trust estate a security for a debt, operates to create an equitable lien on the beneficiary’s interest in such estate. That the interest of the beneficiary is not vested but contingent is immaterial; when the contingent interest becomes vested the equitable lien attaches.</p> <p>3. Equitable Liens. — Creation.—Every express executory agreement in writing, whereby the contracting party sufficiently indicates an intention to make some particular property, real or personal, or fund, therein described and identified, a security for a debt or other obligation, creates an equitable lien upon the property so indicated, which is enforceable against the property. Under like circumstances a mere verbal agreement may create a similar lien upon personal property. Whatever the form of the contract may be, if it is intended thereby to create a security, it is an equitable mortgage, enforced upon the principle that equity will treat that as done which, by agreement, is to be done.</p> <p>4. Equitable Liens. — After-Acquired Property. — An equitable lien upon property, to be acquired in the future, is valid and enforceable.</p> <p>5. Trusts. — Jurisdiction.—A portion of a contingent interest of a beneficiary of a trust estate, upon his death before the death of the life tenant was by a compromise agreement vested in a claimant, charged by the agreement with th
Judges: Sims
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- McCotter v. CarleCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1927-12-22· cited 40×
- Hoffman v. First National BankSupreme Court of Virginia· 1964-04-27· cited 17×
- Steindler v. Virginia Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Virginia· 1934-09-20· cited 10×
- Noremac, Inc. v. Centre Hill Court, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia· 1935-03-14· cited 9×
- Harnsberger v. WrightSupreme Court of Virginia· 1946-10-14· cited 7×
- Harper v. HarperSupreme Court of Virginia· 1932-09-22· cited 6×
- Malarkey v. BallardSupreme Court of Virginia· 1923-11-15· cited 5×
- Hung-Lin Wu v. TsengE.D. Virginia· 2006-10-24· cited 2×
- Mize v. Pennington Gap Bank, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia· 1933-09-21· cited 2×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Walters v. Farmers BankSupreme Court of Virginia· 1881-12-08· cited 36×
- Grubb v. StarkeySupreme Court of Virginia· 1894-12-20· cited 23×
- Beecher v. Lewis & BagbySupreme Court of Virginia· 1888-03-15· cited 18×
- Stevens v. McCormickSupreme Court of Virginia· 1894-06-14· cited 13×
- Green v. SpauldingSupreme Court of Virginia· 1882-04-20· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.