Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 3/17/2010

Brown v. Finnan

Citations

  • 598 F.3d 416
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 5492
  • 2010 WL 935755

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding Douglas 's discussion of section 8-4(c) dicta and explaining that \[t]he main issue in Douglas concerned the retroactive application of People v. Sharpe
  • finding Douglas 's discussion of section 8-4(c) dicta and explaining that \[t]he main issue in Douglas concerned the retroactive application of People v. Sharpe
  • whether appellate counsel should have challenged the sufficiency of the evidence depends on whether that claim had a “reasonable probability” of “alter[ing] the outcome” of the direct appeal
  • no hearing required after victim’s mother proclaimed from the gallery that “the situation is racist,” because the victim and the accused were of the same race and the statement was therefore ambiguous, and because there was no evidence the jury heard it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cudahy, Posner, Rovner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.