Skip to main content
· 5/13/1996

Brown v. Evatt

Citations

  • 470 S.E.2d 848
  • 322 S.C. 189
  • 1996 S.C. LEXIS 74

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining \[n]either the state statutes which create and define the powers of the SCDC nor SCDC's operational classification regulations create the required liberty interest\ in one's security classification
  • inmate has no liberty interest in a particular custody status as long as the challenged conditions or degree of confinement are within the sentence imposed and are not otherwise violative of the Constitution
  • inmate has no liberty interest in a particular custody status as long as the challenged conditions or degree of confinement are within the sentence imposed and are not otherwise violative of the Constitution
  • \[T]he security and custody classification of state prison inmates is a matter for state prison official discretion whose exercise is not subject to federal procedural due process constraints.\
  • § 1983 cause of action fails where no constitutional deprivation
  • affirming dismissal when defendant was not served with a summons

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burnett, Finney, Toal, Moore, Waller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.