Skip to main content
Tenth Circuit· 8/2/2013

Brown v. Eppler

Citations

  • 725 F.3d 1221
  • 2013 WL 3958371
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 15963

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that by creating a policy banning only people who violated certain rules of conduct, the public bus authority had constrained its own discretion and created a property interest in bus ridership
  • holding that the plaintiffs free status at the filing of his complaint did not prevent the PLRA’s exhaustion requirements from applying to the plaintiffs appeal, because the plaintiff was incarcerated when he filed the appeal
  • holding that the Prison Litigation Reform Act, Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (codified as amended in scattered sections of 28 U.S.C. and 42 U.S.C.), applies to individuals who are incarcerated at the time of filing
  • noting that authorization to proceed in forma pauperis only excuses prepayment of the filing fee
  • noting that authorization to proceed in forma pauperis only excuses prepayment of the filing fee
  • noting that authorization to proceed in forma pauperis only excuses prepayment of the filing fee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lucero, Seymour, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Brown v. Eppler

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.