Brown v. Eoff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “Oregon is one of a minority of jurisdictions which recognize the possibility of an irrevocable license”
• noting that a license may become irrevocable where an individual is induced to make “significant expenditures”
• explaining that expenditures, which were not “permanent or particularly expensive,” were problematic because they were “as referable to a revocable license as to an irrevocable license” (citation omitted)
• discussing Oregon’s minority rule that promissory estoppel, combined with significant expenditures on permanent improvements, creates an irrevocable license
• discussing Oregon’s minority rule that promissory estoppel, combined with significant expenditures on permanent improvements, creates an irrevocable license
• “grading, graveling and oiling, none of which are essentially permanent or particularly expensive”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).