Skip to main content
· 3/29/1989

Brown v. Dow Chemical Co.

Citations

  • 777 F. Supp. 504
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17546
  • 1989 WL 260126

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • treating a motion to strike evidence submitted in support of a motion for summary judgment as an objection
  • treating the plaintiffs' motion to strike as an objection under Rule 56(c)(2)
  • “there is no indication that the legislature . . . unmistakably has bound itself to never changing the contribution rate”
  • “[T]he court will treat the plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike as an objection under Rule 56(c)(2).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wingate

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.