· 3/29/1989
Brown v. Dow Chemical Co.
Citations
- 777 F. Supp. 504
- 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17546
- 1989 WL 260126
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- treating a motion to strike evidence submitted in support of a motion for summary judgment as an objection
- treating the plaintiffs' motion to strike as an objection under Rule 56(c)(2)
- “there is no indication that the legislature . . . unmistakably has bound itself to never changing the contribution rate”
- “[T]he court will treat the plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike as an objection under Rule 56(c)(2).”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wingate
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.