Brown v. DHRS

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that HRS had no common-law duty to the parents of children who were sexually abused at a day-care facility to monitor compliance with the permit’s condition that a known sexual abuser would not visit the day-care facility
• holding that HRS had no common-law duty to the parents of children who were sexually abused at a day-care facility to monitor compliance with the permit’s condition that a known sexual abuser would not visit the day-care facility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).