Skip to main content
· 9/3/2010

Brown v. County of Nassau

Citations

  • 736 F. Supp. 2d 602
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92000
  • 2010 WL 3487256

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that where defendant challenged the methodology and conclusions of plaintiff's unopposed expert, defendant was entitled to have the fact-finder evaluate the testimony and credibility of the plaintiff's expert
  • holding a genuine issue of material fact existed as to whether a deaf inmate’s need for accommodation (to contact his attorney and participate in a probable cause hearing via closed-circuit 6 DEROSIER v. STATE/RYAN Decision of the Court television
  • \Courts have recognized that the grant of a motion for summary judgment is often inappropriate where the evidence bearing on crucial issues of fact is in the form of expert opinion testimony.\ (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Joseph F. Bianco

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.