· 11/14/2005
Brown v. County of Berkeley
Citations
- 622 S.E.2d 533
- 366 S.C. 354
- 2005 S.C. LEXIS 338
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that interlocutory orders may be considered on appeal when they are companion to reviewable issues, but finding the motions to dismiss ; unreviewable because they lacked a sufficient “nexus or companionship” to justify the exercise of immediate appellate review
- recognizing courts may accept appeals of interlocutory orders not ordinarily immediately appealable when appealed with a companion issue proper for review, but declining to so where the issues appealed lack a sufficient nexus
- reviewing the denial of a motion to dismiss and finding it not immediately appealable
- \It is well settled that an interlocutory order is not immediately appealable unless it involves the merits of the case or affects a substantial right.\
- \It is well settled that an interlocutory order is not immediately appealable unless it involves the merits of the case or affects a substantial right.\
- clear and unambiguous words in a statute should be given their plain and ordinary meaning
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Toal, Moore, Waller, Burnett, Pleicones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.