Skip to main content
· 11/14/2005

Brown v. County of Berkeley

Citations

  • 622 S.E.2d 533
  • 366 S.C. 354
  • 2005 S.C. LEXIS 338

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that interlocutory orders may be considered on appeal when they are companion to reviewable issues, but finding the motions to dismiss ; unreviewable because they lacked a sufficient “nexus or companionship” to justify the exercise of immediate appellate review
  • recognizing courts may accept appeals of interlocutory orders not ordinarily immediately appealable when appealed with a companion issue proper for review, but declining to so where the issues appealed lack a sufficient nexus
  • reviewing the denial of a motion to dismiss and finding it not immediately appealable
  • \It is well settled that an interlocutory order is not immediately appealable unless it involves the merits of the case or affects a substantial right.\
  • \It is well settled that an interlocutory order is not immediately appealable unless it involves the merits of the case or affects a substantial right.\
  • clear and unambiguous words in a statute should be given their plain and ordinary meaning

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Toal, Moore, Waller, Burnett, Pleicones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.