Brown v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument under Rule 1.14(b) that a client consented to commingling when considering lack of express language allowing consent to commingle in rules, the state of the record, and the underlying policies prohibiting commingling
• rejecting similar argument under Rule 1.14(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).