Skip to main content
· 7/20/2000

Brown v. Coleman Company

Citations

  • 220 F.3d 1180
  • 16 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 966
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 17443
  • 2000 WL 1005259

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding an arbitration clause stating “all disputes arising under or in connection with this Agreement … will be settled exclusively by arbitration” constitutes “the very definition of a broad arbitration clause”
  • reversing a district court’s vacatur of an arbitration award that, though possibly erroneous, “was based on the contract”
  • clause covering “all disputes or controversies arising under or in connection with this Agreement” was “the very definition of a broad arbitration clause.”
  • “[The parties] contracted for the arbitrator’s construction of the contract not a judge’s construction.”
  • arbitration clause including “all disputes or controversies arising under or in connection with this Agreement” is “the very definition of a broad ORDER – PAGE 18 arbitration clause.”
  • “[T]he standard of review of arbitral awards is among the narrowest known to law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baldock, Magill, Lucero

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.