Brown v. Clark Equipment Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing section 302A, although trial court’s refusal to give jury instruction reciting section 302A was proper because instruction was ultimately unnecessary
• finding safety data, codes or standards promulgated by voluntary industry organizations “admissible as evidence on the issue of negligence” and “as an alternative to or utilized to buttress expert testimony”
• \ Rohlfing ... established the rule that recovery for pain and suffering depended on the existence of conscious pain and suffering .\
• evidence of safety codes is “admissible as an alternative to or utilized to buttress expert testimony”
• evidence of safety codes is \admissible as an alternative to or utilized to buttress expert testimony\
• expert testimony unnecessary where the issues are within the common knowledge of the jurors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).