Brown v. California Pension Administrators & Consultants, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that, where agreements 12 explicitly informed appellant that defendants had no responsibility for investment choices, “[i]t is 13 difficult to imagine language that would more clearly limit a contracting party’s duty to another”
• affirming dismissal of claim alleging breach of fiduciary duty against pension administrator because “the relationship was confined to respondents’ performance of transactions selected by their customers”
• finding “absolutely no responsibility to advise [customers] with regard to the wisdom of their investment choices” when the relationship was confined to respondents’ performance of transactions selected by their customers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).